| Can I Be Sure I'm Saved? Media | ||
|---|---|---|
| Image: Front Cover (High Res) | ||
| Image: Back Cover (High Res) | ||
Monday, December 31, 2012
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
Protestant Theology & Catholic Doctrines Exposed to cover & discover the “Naked Truth“..-- Monkey Religion--Patrick j miron and this form of scriptural mental masturbation
ok
The delusion beliefs and commentary of Patrick J Miron
I’m a Catholic…Forgiveness of Sin in the Bible belong to the APOSTLES, and the Roman Catholic Church,
not to the Disciples of Jesus,
FROM: agapebiblestudy.org
Ed. note Patrick j miron likes the version that says Apostles, and is the basis of his argument
18 Mary Magdalene went to the disciples with the news: “I have seen the Lord!” And she told them that he had said these things to her.
21 Again Jesus said, “Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you.” 22 And with that he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. 23 If you forgive anyone’s sins, their sins are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven.”
Patrick j miron :
patrick j miron continues with
another version of the scripture
8Miryam from Magdala came announc- ing to the taught ones that she had seen the Master, and that He had told her this. 19When therefore it was evening on that day, the first day of the week, and when the doors were shut where the taught ones met, for fear of the Yehudim, 
came and stood in the midst, and said to them, “Peace to you.” 20And having said this, He showed them His hands and His side. The taught ones therefore rejoiced when they saw the Master. 21Then said to them again, “Peace to you! As the Father has sent Me, I also send you.” 22And having said this, He breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Set- apart Spirit. 23“If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they have been retained.” 24But T’oma, called the Twin, one of the twelve, was not with them when came, 25so the other taught ones said to him, “We have seen the Master.” But he said to them, “Unless I see in His hands the mark of the nails, and put my finger into the imprint of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I shall by no means believe.”
Patrick j Miron then says :
I’m a Catholic…Forgiveness of Sin in the Bible belong to the APOSTLES, and the Roman Catholic Church,
Assembled by Pat Miron , (with Ed additional commentary)
FROM: agapebiblestudy.org
Protestant Theology & Catholic Doctrines
Exposed to cover & discover the “Naked Truth“... Catholic responses to the Booklet: “Answers to my Catholic Friends” by Thomas F. Heinze … Part 10b
A Catholic reply to Protestant “[mis]- Understandings” Part 10b
Patrick j miron and this form of scriptural mental masturbation
I. Jesus Christ Granted the Apostles His Authority to Forgive Sins
John 20:21 - before He grants them the authority to forgive sins, Jesus says to the apostles, "as the Father sent me, so I send you." As Christ was sent by the Father to forgive sins, so Christ sends the apostles and their successors forgive sins.
John 20:22 - the Lord "breathes" on the apostles, and then gives them the power to forgive and retain sins. The only other moment in Scripture where God breathes on man is in Gen. 2:7, when the Lord "breathes" divine life into man. When this happens, a significant transformation takes place.
John 20:23 - Jesus says, "If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven. If you retain the sins of any, they are retained." In order for the apostles to exercise this gift of forgiving sins, the penitents must orally confess their sins to them because the apostles are not mind readers. The text makes this very clear.
there is always another version of the scripture
Ed note
Matt. 9:8 - this verse shows that God has given the authority to forgive sins to "men."
Hence, those Protestants who acknowledge that the apostles(disciples) had the authority to forgive sins (which this verse demonstrates) must prove that this gift ended with the apostles. Otherwise, the apostles' successors still possess this gift. Where in Scripture is the gift of authority to forgive sins taken away from the apostles or their successors?
Hence, those Protestants who acknowledge that the apostles(disciples) had the authority to forgive sins (which this verse demonstrates) must prove that this gift ended with the apostles. Otherwise, the apostles' successors still possess this gift. Where in Scripture is the gift of authority to forgive sins taken away from the apostles or their successors?
Matt. 9:6; Mark 2:10 - Christ forgave sins as a man (not God) to convince us that the "Son of man" has authority to forgive sins on earth.
Luke 5:24 - Luke also points out that Jesus' authority to forgive sins is as a man, not God. The Gospel writers record this to convince us that God has given this authority to men. This authority has been transferred from Christ to the apostles and their successors.
Matt. 18:18 - the apostles are given authority to bind and loose. ( it really is disciples)
This is a significant area of delusion of scripture interpretation, by Patrick J Miron
PjM Opinion: significant area of delusion
The authority to bind and loose includes administering and removing the temporal penalties due to sin. The Jews understood this since the birth of the Church. ( huh ?) patrick j miron dosen't seem to realize that it was the followers who were Jews as such.
That the Roman Catholic Church was mainly composed of Gentiles.. about-325 with Constantine
Constantine was born in Naissus, Upper Moesia, on 27 February in roughly AD 285. Another account places the year at about AD 272 or 273.
He was the son of Helena, an inn keeper's daughter, and Constantius Chlorus. It is unclear if the two were married and so Constantine may well have been an illegitimate child.
This is a significant area of delusion of scripture interpretation, by Patrick J Miron
PjM Opinion: significant area of delusion
The authority to bind and loose includes administering and removing the temporal penalties due to sin. The Jews understood this since the birth of the Church. ( huh ?) patrick j miron dosen't seem to realize that it was the followers who were Jews as such.
That the Roman Catholic Church was mainly composed of Gentiles.. about-325 with Constantine
Constantine was born in Naissus, Upper Moesia, on 27 February in roughly AD 285. Another account places the year at about AD 272 or 273.
He was the son of Helena, an inn keeper's daughter, and Constantius Chlorus. It is unclear if the two were married and so Constantine may well have been an illegitimate child.
John 20:22-23; Matt. 18:18 - the power to remit/retain sin is also the power to remit/retain punishment due to sin. If Christ's ministers (Disciples) can forgive the eternal penalty of sin,( the reason you go to purgatory) they can certainly remit the temporal penalty of sin (which is called an "indulgence").
Purgatory: An Essential Roman Catholic Doctrine James McCarthy |
| Though there is no biblical basis for purgatory, there is a strong philosophical need for it in Roman Catholic theology. The Church views salvation as the objective adornment or beautification of the soul. It is a process which starts at baptism through which sanctifying grace is initially infused. This makes the soul holy and inherently pleasing to God. Other sacraments and good works further justify the soul and make it increasingly attractive to God. The goal is to transform the essential character of the soul into something which is in itself objectively good. It is, therefore, only reasonable to require the complete cleansing of every vestige of sin before the soul can come into the presence of God. Purgatory, therefore, is the logical extension of the Church’s process of salvation. |
2 Cor. 2:10 - Paul forgives in the presence of Christ (some translations refer to the presences of Christ as "in persona Christi"). Some say that this may also be a reference to sins.
2 Cor. 5:18 - the ministry of reconciliation was given to the ambassadors of the Church. This ministry of reconciliation refers to the sacrament of reconciliation, also called the sacrament of confession or penance.
this is not true the RCC sacrament of confession has a different focal point and only got changed at Vatacan ll
This is a significant area of delusion of scripture interpretation, by Patrick J Miron
this is not true the RCC sacrament of confession has a different focal point and only got changed at Vatacan ll
This is a significant area of delusion of scripture interpretation, by Patrick J Miron
James 5:15-16 - in verse 15 we see that sins are forgiven by the priests in the sacrament of the sick. This is another example of man's authority to forgive sins on earth. Then in verse 16, James says “Therefore, confess our sins to one another,” in reference to the men referred to in verse 15,
the priests of the Church. this is a RCC and Patrick j Miron Delusion
the priests of the Church. this is a RCC and Patrick j Miron Delusion
1 Tim. 2:5 - Christ is the only mediator, but He was free to decide how His mediation would be applied to us. The Lord chose to use priests of God to carry out His work of forgiveness.
Lev. 5:4-6; 19:21-22 - even under the Old Covenant, God used priests to forgive and atone for the sins of others.
Ed. note Patrick j miron likes the version that says Apostles, and is the basis of his argument
18 Mary Magdalene went to the disciples with the news: “I have seen the Lord!” And she told them that he had said these things to her.
Jesus Appears to His Disciples, is one of the common forms of the Greek and Hebrew
19 On the evening of that first day of the week, when the disciples were together, with the doors locked for fear of the Jewish leaders, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you!” 20 After he said this, he showed them his hands and side. The disciples were overjoyed when they saw the Lord.21 Again Jesus said, “Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you.” 22 And with that he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. 23 If you forgive anyone’s sins, their sins are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven.”
Patrick j miron :
The first thing to note here is that Jesus breathes on his disciples. This is the second time in all history that God breathes on man (the first time was when he gave man the breath of life, in Genesis 2:7).
Surely, something significant is happening. Christ then goes on to say that if they (the Apostles) forgive the sins of people, then they are forgiven. If they do not forgive them, they are not forgiven. Here Protestants object by saying that the original Greek should be translated as "If you forgive men's sins, they have been forgiven them...."
Well, I (patrick j Miron) am not a Greek scholar and it is unfitting for me to say whether it should be translated this way rather than the way it has been,
but I do know that the original Greek word is in a perfect tense [of the verb aphiemi], suggesting near past. So patrick's Ego and self righteous education must make him "Right".
But either way, it does not change the fact that Jesus is here giving his Apostles the power to forgive and retain sins. If they forgive them, then God has forgiven them. If they retain them, then God has retained them. You see that by the mere changing of tenses, the context and meaning is not altered in the least.
Many, if not all, Protestants have tried to find their way around
John 20:21-23. They try to make it Jesus' words mean something like, "If God forgives their sins, then you proclaim them forgiven" or, "If you deliver the Gospel to people, then they shall be freed from their sins." However, this is not what Jesus said. He said plainly and simply: "If you forgive men's sins, they are forgiven. If not, then they are not." These are the Lord's Words, not mine. Jesus had ample opportunity to state what he said in all kinds of different ways. He did not, however.
How do we know that Jesus gave this power to his Apostles ONLY and not to everybody? To answer this question,
Patrick j Miron says that
we must first note that John's Gospel nowhere uses the term "Apostles" as a reference to the Twelve.
so we must believe Patrick j miron's interpretation and commentary
So the omission of that term here is insignificant. At least the power was only explicitly given to the disciples that were in the upper room, that is for sure (see verse 19). We can further reason that from the context the term "them" in verse 22 is used in the same sense as it is in verse 24 where it refers to the Twelve.
Ed note
came said to them again, “PeacePatrick j Miron then says :
Of course, the typical Protestant response to all of this is,
"But only GOD can forgive sins!" And that is true. Of course.
But the Sacrament of Penance does not deny this. We're not saying the priest forgives the sins instead of God. Rather, and AGAIN, God works through the priest. Neither do we believe that we should go to confession INSTEAD of "praying straight to God," but rather, one should do BOTH, not either/or.
For additional info contact
Passage: PArt 10b Protestant Theology and catholic Doctrine this is the final segment in this series
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/catholicquestions/attachments/folder/400306559/item/list
Monday, December 17, 2012
Dumb and Dumber-- boysville of michigan-- alvin glombowski education? Naa
ok
Ya the amazing thing about this school... is as i found out AFTER THE FACT..
that it is a "SPECIAL EDUCATION" SCHOOL...
SO THEY DON'T HAVE... to teach U nothing !!
What do I mean by such a statement, "Casting Lots?"
In the Holy Scriptures priests- specifically in the Old Testament- would cast lots (dice like stones). The casting of lots was an appeal to the decision of Yahweh.
It was therefore used for systematically making decisions. We don't need such for today seeing that we now have the inerrant Word of God acompanied by the Holy Spirit.
2 Timothy 3:16 tells us that, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness."
Proverbs 13:18, "Poverty and shame shall be to him that refuseth instruction: but he that regardeth reproof shall be honoured."
Proverbs 15:10, "Correction is grievous unto him that forsaketh the way: and he that hateth reproof shall die."
I invite the reader to place his or her traditions squarely on the table.
You may feel a little uncomfortable to admit to the role of tradition in one's thinking, but the reward is great.
The Christian who constantly seeks to be conformed to the truth of God's Word will have confidence in that truth.
Isaiah 1:18, "Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD."
Strap your boots on. Its time to get serious...
ormer student thomas more high school clinton michigan
Ya the amazing thing about this school... is as i found out AFTER THE FACT..
that it is a "SPECIAL EDUCATION" SCHOOL...
SO THEY DON'T HAVE... to teach U nothing !!
What do I mean by such a statement, "Casting Lots?"
In the Holy Scriptures priests- specifically in the Old Testament- would cast lots (dice like stones). The casting of lots was an appeal to the decision of Yahweh.
It was therefore used for systematically making decisions. We don't need such for today seeing that we now have the inerrant Word of God acompanied by the Holy Spirit.
2 Timothy 3:16 tells us that, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness."
Proverbs 13:18, "Poverty and shame shall be to him that refuseth instruction: but he that regardeth reproof shall be honoured."
Proverbs 15:10, "Correction is grievous unto him that forsaketh the way: and he that hateth reproof shall die."
I invite the reader to place his or her traditions squarely on the table.
You may feel a little uncomfortable to admit to the role of tradition in one's thinking, but the reward is great.
The Christian who constantly seeks to be conformed to the truth of God's Word will have confidence in that truth.
Isaiah 1:18, "Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD."
Strap your boots on. Its time to get serious...
Monday, November 26, 2012
Paul Simon - You Can Call Me Al--glombowski
ok start heree
but have come to understand that it is God who limits their understanding;
Patrick j miron doctrune--This “hidden messages” is God’s way of formulating a particular cross for non-Catholics to carry. -- this burden is imposed to make clear His displeasure with what is going on,
Having identified the underlying cause of the problem as an apparent inability to consistently understand correctly and fully, the Written Words of God,
I am now obligated to explain just why it happens.
The underlying cause is a God imposed penalty for NOT doing what He say’s and NOT fully following ALL of His teachings, as will be clearly demonstrated.
Exactly how God accomplishes this remains a mystery
. The fact that He is behind it, is not.
I suspect it is accomplished by withholding Devine guidance, as is His Right. There is evidence of an unintentional selective application of passages elected and chosen to solidify the positions expressed by Brother Heinze, that I have seen quite often by his contemporaries.
At first I thought it might be intentional;
but have come to understand that it is God who limits their understanding;
making it still possible, but far more difficult for them to uncover and discover God’s Fullness of Truth.
It’s a battle between Pride and Humility; Good and Evil; Partial truths and the Fullness of Gods Own Truth.
Rom.9: 18 “What then are we to say? Is there injustice on the part of God? Of course not! For he says to Moses: "I will show mercy to whom I will, I will take pity on whom I will." So it depends not upon a person's will or exertion, but upon God, who shows mercy. “
Heb. 3 12 “Take care, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God. But exhort one another every day, as long as it is called "today," that none of you may be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin. For we share in Christ, if only we hold our first confidence firm to the end, while it is said, "Today, when you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion."
Rom. 9:15 “For he says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion."
Mt. 11: 25-26 “At that time Jesus declared, "I thank thee, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that thou hast hidden these things from the wise and understanding and revealed them to babes;
yea, Father, for such was thy gracious will. All things have been delivered to me by my Father; and no one knows the Son except the Father,
and no one knows the Father except the Son and any one to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.”
This “hidden messages” is God’s way of formulating a particular cross for non-Catholics to carry.
special doctrine with patrick j miron
Because God can ONLY be a “Good and Fair” God
[anything less would deny His Divinity],
this burden is imposed to make clear His displeasure with what is going on, and
the fact that never once in the entire Bible, did or has God permitted a belief in more than one God [Triune], or more than
Only One set of Faith-beliefs, or ever guide, guard and protect more than one “church” [or one chosen people.] This FACT alone ought to put everyone on the “same page.”
That friends sets us up for the discussion of the positions expressed so kindly by Mr. Thomas Heinze.
I will first share his views and evidences, and then provide our Catholic response to them.
The first topic selected by Mr. Heinze, is the Catholic Mass.
“Answers to my Catholic Friends” by Thomas F. Heinze
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Monday, September 10, 2012
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
Sunday, August 19, 2012
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Saturday, August 11, 2012
Disciple of A.A Allen, God's General Visit TB Joshua "vs" patrick j miron
Understanding the "Keys" to the kingdom .. given to the CC and Patrick j miron..
Every one else does not have the "keys" to the keydom..
listen to the ministry of patrick j miron--
Every one else does not have the "keys" to the keydom..
listen to the ministry of patrick j miron--
Friday, August 10, 2012
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Sunday, July 29, 2012
Friday, July 27, 2012
the pope's followers have not hesitated to brutally subdue the enemies of "the Church".Catholicism built its own philosophical system to justify the use of carnal (fleshly, human, physical) means to achieve spiritual ends.
Those who classify themselves as Christians can be divided into 2 broad groups:
those who have chosen to allow the Bible to be their final authority
and those who have chosen to allow men to be their final authority.
For sake of simplicity, I shall refer to the first group as "Bible believing Christians."
The latter group has always been best represented by Roman Catholicism, by far its largest, most powerful, and most influential component.
The Roman Catholic hierarchy has always boldly stated that it is not dependent upon Scripture alone, but also accepts tradition as another pillar of truth -- and where a conflict exists, tradition receives the greater acceptance.
Being its own arbiter of what is to be accepted as truth, it accepts no authority as being higher than itself. This explains why the Catholic belief system has been constantly evolving over the centuries.
This also explains why a fierce antagonism has always existed between Bible believing Christianity and Roman Catholicism. Rome's frequent spiritual innovations excites the passions of Bible believers, who react adversely to religious modifications that are at odds with the eternal, changeless Word of God.
Harboring a supreme confidence in the Book, a trust which reflects their trust in the Holy Spirit who authored the Scriptures, the Bible believers boldly challenge the suppositions of the Catholic hierarchy.
In the course of this spiritual warfare, Catholic people are frequently converted from trust in Rome's complex religious system to a childlike faith in the Saviour and a simple reliance on His Word. Many such converts ultimately leave the Church of Rome to join local, New Testament churches.
Frequently in history, the trickle of individuals who were making this remarkable transformation turned into a flood. Such ruptures cannot go unchecked by the Catholic hierarchy. As with any bureaucracy, its primary interest is its own protection and propagation.
The nature of its response to the inroads made by spiritual challengers is dictated by its cultural surroundings. The more Catholic the culture, the more severe the response.
In past centuries, when Rome's ecclesiastical power was virtually absolute throughout Europe, the intensity of the attacks by the papists upon their spiritual enemies could be equally absolute.
Ignoring the injunction of II Corinthians 10:4 ("For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal..."),
Catholicism built its own philosophical system to justify the use of carnal (fleshly, human, physical) means to achieve spiritual ends.
Having divorced herself from Biblical absolutes, Catholicism adopted a theology in which she sees herself as the church founded upon the Apostle Peter by Jesus Christ, and alone empowered to bring salvation to the world.
Further, she believes herself assigned the daunting task of bringing Christ's kingdom to fruition on earth. With those dogmas forming her philosophical foundation, she seeks her power in the political sphere as well as the religious realm.
To whatever degree she achieves political power, to that degree she feels compelled to use her secular influence as a weapon against her spiritual adversaries. Thus, down through the centuries, we see that in those countries in which Catholicism had achieved absolute power, the pope's followers have not hesitated to brutally subdue the enemies of "the Church".
Although Jews, Moslems, pagans, and others have felt the wrath of Rome, her special fury has always been reserved for her bitterest and most effective challengers -- Bible believing Christians. Only as the political climate changed in recent centuries did the Catholic hierarchy see it expedient to change tactics and appear to be more tolerant.
Yet, to this day we see persecution continuing in those places on the globe dominated by Catholicism. The degree of the persecution is determined by the degree of control.
To what lengths is the Catholic hierarchy prepared to go in its drive to repress opposition and achieve its goal of instituting the kingdom of Christ on earth? To find the answer, one must look to the pages of history.
Thursday, July 26, 2012
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
ON THE MOST HOLY SACRAMENT OF THE EUCHARIST if any one shall presume to teach, preach, or obstinately to assert, or even in public disputation to defend the contrary, he shall be thereupon excommunicated.
The Thirteenth Session
The canons and decrees of the sacred
and oecumenical Council of Trent,
Ed. and trans. J. Waterworth (London: Dolman, 1848), 75-91.
Hanover Historical Texts Project
Scanned by Hanover College students in 1995.
The page numbers of Waterworth's translation appear in brackets.
[Page 75]
[Page 76]
On the real presence of our Lord Jesus Christ in the most holy sacrament of the Eucharist.
[Page 77]
On the reason of the Institution of this most holy Sacrament.
On the excellency of the most holy Eucharist over the rest of the Sacraments.
On Transubstantiation.
[Page 79]
On the cult and veneration to be shown to this most holy Sacrament.
The holy Synod declares, moreover, that very piously and religiously was this custom introduced into the Church, that this sublime and venerable sacrament be, with special veneration and solemnity, celebrated, every year, on a certain day, and that a festival; and that it be borne reverently and with honour in processions through the streets, and public places. For it is most just that there be certain appointed holy days, whereon all Christians may, with a special and unusual demonstration, testify that their minds are grateful and thankful to their common Lord and Redeemer for so ineffable and truly divine a benefit, whereby the victory and triumph of His death are represented. And so indeed did it behove victorious truth to celebrate a triumph over falsehood and heresy, that thus her adversaries, at the sight of so much splendour, and in the midst of so great joy of the universal Church, may either pine away weakened and broken; or, touched with shame and confounded, at length repent.
[Page 80]
On reserving the Sacrament of the sacred Eucharist, and bearing it to the Sick.
On the preparation to be given that one may worthily receive the sacred Eucharist.
On the use of this admirable Sacrament.
But forasmuch as it is not enough to declare the truth, if errors be not laid bare and repudiated, it hath seemed good to the holy Synod to subjoin these canons, that all, -the Catholic doctrine being already recognised,-may now also understand what are the heresies which they ought to guard against and avoid.
CANON I.-If any one denieth, that, in the sacrament of the most holy Eucharist, are contained truly, really, and substantially, the body and blood together with the soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, and consequently the whole Christ; but saith that He is only therein as in a sign, or in figure, or virtue; let him be anathema.
CANON lI.-If any one saith, that, in the sacred and holy sacrament of the Eucharist, the substance of the bread and wine remains conjointly with the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, and denieth that wonderful and singular conversion of the whole substance of the bread into the Body, and of the whole substance of the wine into the Blood-the species Only of the bread and wine remaining-which conversion indeed the Catholic Church most aptly calls Transubstantiation; let him be anathema.
CANON III.-If any one denieth, that, in the venerable sacrament of the Eucharist, the whole Christ is contained under each [Page 83] species, and under every part of each species, when separated; let him be anathema.
CANON IV.-If any one saith, that, after the consecration is completed, the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ are not in the admirable sacrament of the Eucharist, but (are there) only during the use, whilst it is being taken, and not either before or after; and that, in the hosts, or consecrated particles, which are reserved or which remain after communion, the true Body of the Lord remaineth not; let him be anathema.
CANON V.-If any one saith, either that the principal fruit of the most holy Eucharist is the remission of sins, or, that other effects do not result therefrom; let him be anathema.
CANON VI.-If any one saith, that, in the holy sacrament of the Eucharist, Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, is not to be adored with the worship, even external of latria; and is, consequently, neither to be venerated with a special festive solemnity, nor to be solemnly borne about in processions, according to the laudable and universal rite and custom of holy church; or, is not to be proposed publicly to the people to be adored, and that the adorers thereof are idolators; let him be anathema.
CANON VII.-If any one saith, that it is not lawful for the sacred Eucharist to be reserved in the sacrarium, but that, immediately after consecration, it must necessarily be distributed amongst those present; or, that it is not lawful that it be carried with honour to the sick; let him be anathema.
CANON VIII.-lf any one saith, that Christ, given in the Eucharist, is eaten spiritually only, and not also sacramentally and really; let him be anathema.
CANON IX.-If any one denieth, that all and each of Christ's faithful of both sexes are bound, when they have attained to years of discretion, to communicate every year, at least at Easter, in accordance with the precept of holy Mother Church; let him be anathema.
[Page 84] CANON X.-If any one saith, that it is not lawful for the celebrating priest to communicate himself; let him be anathema.
CANON XI.-lf any one saith, that faith alone is a sufficient preparation for receiving the sacrament of the most holy Eucharist; let him be anathema. And for fear lest so great a sacrament may be received unworthily, and so unto death and condemnation, this holy Synod ordains and declares, that sacramental confession, when a confessor may be had, is of necessity to be made beforehand, by those whose conscience is burthened with mortal sin, how contrite even soever they may think themselves. But if any one shall presume to teach, preach, or obstinately to assert, or even in public disputation to defend the contrary, he shall be thereupon excommunicated.
How To Study Your Bible - Chuck Missler "vs" patrick j Miron
choose your bible teacher - who will not lead you astray-- patrick j miron or chuck missler
Friday, July 20, 2012
The Power Of Speaking In Tongues Part 2-- "Vs' patrick j miron-- RELIGIOUS PIETY
patrick j miron is convinced that his religious piety is just as powerful as the real holy spirit--
Because patrick miron is a CC with the real presence in the wafer.. his teacher taught him that praying in tongues is "psyco-babble.. his mentor Alvin glombowski taught \him this also..
Because only the CC and peter has the keys to the kingdon
Because patrick miron is a CC with the real presence in the wafer.. his teacher taught him that praying in tongues is "psyco-babble.. his mentor Alvin glombowski taught \him this also..
Because only the CC and peter has the keys to the kingdon
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Monday, July 16, 2012
patrick j miron religious training Kills Two Birds with One Stone - Family Guy
Patrick j miron says he has a special talent or spiritual gifting on how to tell if scripture is correctly interpertered!
Boysville of michigan education and training in action
Boysville of michigan education and training in action
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Friday, July 6, 2012
well what if we asked patrick j miron
well
Re: Catholic Questions Trent an In Dept study oart 3
All unconfessed sins are unpardonable, according to Catholic doctrine. In "this case" or any other. And there are a lot of sins that blind people to their own need for forgiveness. Anger leaps to mind. Lust. Pride. It sounds like you aren't really distinguishing this sin, the only one that Jesus *ever* implied was unforgiveable, from any other sin. Unforgiveable, as in, even if you ask for forgiveness (ie confess) it won't be forgiven. Very dangerous. Calling it "particularly grievous" is like calling Jesus a prophet. True, but it ignores the bigger picture.
Maybe the idea of an unforgiveable sin disturbs you. Horrifies you, even. It should. It's a terrifying concept. You're doomed. No forgiveness. It clashes with our idea of what we want God to be. It damages our comfort. But better to live without the comfort and avoid the unthinkable than to perish in our ignorance.
Francine De-Good
mistaken blue berries "4" the wrong type of blue berries
Well what If:
Re: Catholic Questions Trent an In Dept study oart 3
All unconfessed sins are unpardonable, according to Catholic doctrine. In "this case" or any other. And there are a lot of sins that blind people to their own need for forgiveness. Anger leaps to mind. Lust. Pride. It sounds like you aren't really distinguishing this sin, the only one that Jesus *ever* implied was unforgiveable, from any other sin. Unforgiveable, as in, even if you ask for forgiveness (ie confess) it won't be forgiven. Very dangerous. Calling it "particularly grievous" is like calling Jesus a prophet. True, but it ignores the bigger picture.
Maybe the idea of an unforgiveable sin disturbs you. Horrifies you, even. It should. It's a terrifying concept. You're doomed. No forgiveness. It clashes with our idea of what we want God to be. It damages our comfort. But better to live without the comfort and avoid the unthinkable than to perish in our ignorance.
Francine DeGrood Taylor
Thursday, July 5, 2012
Roman Catholic training with Sesame Street: Jude Law_Cling
Believe every thing the Roman Catholic religion teaches you and then you will be saved!!
My Name is Patrick j Miron Time After Time, let me help you
The Mind of a Pathological Liar (Mental Health Guru), Training with Patrick J Miron
Patrick J miron got training with Alvin A Glombowski, and Maureen Barledge.. Theis ws after his "extensive" training at Boysville of Michigan , with the Brothers of Holy Cross
Defective training and education seems to lead to defective thinking.
But Hey.. Patrick J Miron just want's to be "Right".. just like you..HaHA
Defective training and education seems to lead to defective thinking.
But Hey.. Patrick J Miron just want's to be "Right".. just like you..HaHA
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
The Mind of a Pathological Liar (Mental Health Guru) training with Patrick j miron and alvin glombowski
patrick j miron and alvin glombowski, has personal experience with maureen Barledge, but you can start your training at Boysville of michigan and the Thomas More high school.
The Holy Cross Brothers can give you some tips on deceite, and how to wear a black dress and still feel like a man
RC Sproul - Assurance in Salvation Question "vs" Patrick j Miron / How to be "Saved"?
Are you "Saved"? maybe not-- get your advice from Patrick J Miron or from some-other fish in the pond
But assurance of salvation is possible in this life. Indeed, as Dr. R.C. Sproul argues in this Crucial Questions booklet, it is the duty of Christians to make their calling sure (2 Peter 1:10). To help believers reach this goal, Dr. Sproul defines assurance, shows how we can get it, reveals the blessings it confers, and warns of the dangers of false assurance. Here is assistance for those who struggle to know where they stand with Jesus Christ.
As a gifted communicator, R.C. Sproul has helped many believers grow in their understanding of such matters as the nature of God, the history of redemption, and the manner in which we are saved. Now Dr. Sproul’s lucid teaching on these vital matters is available in a series of concise booklets that are perfect for personal learning and refreshing, as well as small-group study. For a quick introduction to matters at the very core of the Christian life, for yourself or a friend, consider the Crucial Questions booklets from Reformation Trust Publishing.
View all the booklets in the Crucial Questions series
call us1(800)435-4343
Can I Be Sure I’m Saved?
by Dr. R.C. Sproul Summary
Many people in the church today are plagued by doubts about their salvation. Satan whispers that it is impossible that sinners such as they could be in a state of grace, and some churches compound the problem by teaching that it is possible for believers to lose their salvation.But assurance of salvation is possible in this life. Indeed, as Dr. R.C. Sproul argues in this Crucial Questions booklet, it is the duty of Christians to make their calling sure (2 Peter 1:10). To help believers reach this goal, Dr. Sproul defines assurance, shows how we can get it, reveals the blessings it confers, and warns of the dangers of false assurance. Here is assistance for those who struggle to know where they stand with Jesus Christ.
As a gifted communicator, R.C. Sproul has helped many believers grow in their understanding of such matters as the nature of God, the history of redemption, and the manner in which we are saved. Now Dr. Sproul’s lucid teaching on these vital matters is available in a series of concise booklets that are perfect for personal learning and refreshing, as well as small-group study. For a quick introduction to matters at the very core of the Christian life, for yourself or a friend, consider the Crucial Questions booklets from Reformation Trust Publishing.
View all the booklets in the Crucial Questions series
Read a Sample Chapter
Developing Christian Character by R.C. Sproul 
Assured By God: Living in the Fullness of God’s Grace by Burk Parsons 
Chosen by God: 2002 Colorado Springs Conference by Ligon Duncan 
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)